Who are the leading writers and voices in Indigenous Futurism?

Grace Dillon (Anishinaabe) is the movement's primary academic framer and the editor of Walking the Clouds, the foundational anthology. Cherie Dimaline (Métis) gained wide attention with The Marrow Thieves, a dystopian novel in which Indigenous peoples are hunted for their bone marrow. Stephen Graham Jones (Blackfeet) writes horror and SF that centres Indigenous characters and cosmologies. Darcie Little Badger (Lipan Apache) writes fantasy and SF with Indigenous protagonists. Kim TallBear (Dakota) does not write fiction but her academic work on Native science studies is essential reading for anyone writing Indigenous SF. The anthology Love after the End, edited by Joshua Whitehead, collects queer Indigenous SF specifically. These are starting points, not an exhaustive list, and the movement is growing rapidly.

How do Indigenous cosmologies and knowledge systems inform futurist world-building?

Indigenous knowledge systems often have fundamentally different ontological assumptions from the Western scientific paradigm that underpins most mainstream SF. Many Indigenous traditions understand relationships between humans, animals, plants, weather, and land as reciprocal and continuing rather than hierarchical and extractive. Time is frequently understood cyclically or as a web of relationships rather than linearly. Ancestors are present and relevant rather than historical. These are not primitive versions of Western concepts waiting to be refined; they are fully developed frameworks with their own rigour, and they produce radically different speculative futures when used as world-building foundations. A future built on reciprocal land relationships looks very different from a future built on resource extraction, even when both have advanced technology.

The Indigenous Futurism Writing Guide

Q: What is Indigenous Futurism and how does it differ from mainstream SF?

Indigenous Futurism is a speculative fiction framework, term coined by Grace Dillon in her 2012 anthology Walking the Clouds, that centres Indigenous peoples' visions of their own futures rather than the futures imagined by colonial and settler cultures. Mainstream SF has frequently erased Indigenous peoples from future timelines entirely, treating them as belonging to a vanishing past rather than a continuing and evolving present. Indigenous Futurism insists that Indigenous peoples will exist in the future, that their knowledge systems, relationships to land, and ways of being are not primitive antecedents to modernity but valid and enduring frameworks for imagining what comes next. The genre explicitly connects to the survivance tradition in Indigenous literature: the insistence on presence and continuity rather than victimhood and disappearance.

Q: Can non-Indigenous writers write Indigenous Futurism, and what are the ethical considerations?

This is the central ethical question for non-Indigenous writers interested in the genre. The consensus among Indigenous writers and scholars is that non-Indigenous writers should not write Indigenous characters as protagonists in ways that claim to represent specific Indigenous cultural knowledge, spiritual practices, or community experiences from the inside. What non-Indigenous writers can do is write speculative fiction in which Indigenous characters appear as full human beings without cultural tourism, support and amplify Indigenous writers' work through reviews and recommendations, and engage with Indigenous Futurism as readers and scholars before attempting anything as writers. If you are committed to writing fiction that engages with Indigenous peoples and futures, the minimum baseline is sustained deep engagement with Indigenous-authored criticism and fiction from the specific nations whose cultures you are engaging with, followed by community accountability.

Q: What is the relationship between Indigenous Futurism and Afrofuturism?

Indigenous Futurism and Afrofuturism share a common project: using speculative fiction to imagine futures for peoples whose humanity and futures have been systematically denied or erased by colonial and racist ideologies. Both movements emerged partly in response to mainstream SF's implicit whiteness and its tendency to project Western capitalist modernity as the default future. The movements have different cultural and historical foundations but have developed in dialogue with each other. Grace Dillon explicitly situates Indigenous Futurism in relation to the Afrofuturist tradition established by scholars like Alondra Nelson. Reading across both movements gives you a richer understanding of what speculative fiction can do when it centres experiences and knowledge systems outside the Western mainstream.

Speculative fiction that insists Indigenous peoples will exist in the future: how to write, read, and engage with a genre built on survivance, reciprocal land relationships, and the refusal to vanish.

Start Writing with iWrity

2012

Grace Dillon's Walking the Clouds defines the genre academically

574+

Federally recognised Indigenous nations in the US alone, each with distinct futures

Survivance

Presence and continuity, not victimhood and disappearance, at the genre's core

Six Pillars of Indigenous Futurism Craft

Survivance: Writing Presence, Not Disappearance

Gerald Vizenor's concept of survivance, a portmanteau of survival and resistance, is the philosophical foundation of Indigenous Futurism. It insists on Native presence, continuity, and active agency against the narrative of inevitable disappearance that colonial culture has imposed on Indigenous peoples for centuries. In practice, survivance as a writing principle means your Indigenous characters exist in the future because they have always been in the future, not because they have survived some dramatic survival narrative. They are not remnants or exceptions; they are people whose cultures and communities have continued and evolved. Avoid the “last of their kind” trope, the magical wisdom-keeper who exists to help non-Indigenous protagonists, and the tragic victim whose death serves a settler character's growth arc. These are patterns that erase rather than assert Indigenous presence.

Cosmological World-Building: Time, Land, and Reciprocity

Indigenous futures built on Indigenous cosmologies look fundamentally different from futures extrapolated from Western scientific modernity. Many Indigenous traditions understand time as cyclical or web-like rather than linear, making the future not a point ahead but a relationship with ancestors and descendants simultaneously. Land is understood as a relative and a reciprocal partner rather than a resource to be managed. These are not metaphors for Western concepts; they are different ontological frameworks that produce different futures. A society built on the assumption of reciprocal obligations to land does not develop the same technologies or political structures as one built on extraction. When you build a speculative world from Indigenous cosmological assumptions, you are not just changing the flavour of the world; you are changing its fundamental logic.

Community Accountability: Research, Consultation, and Credit

Indigenous Futurism, especially when engaged by non-Indigenous writers, requires a level of community accountability that goes beyond standard research practices. This means reading Indigenous-authored criticism and fiction as the primary foundation, not mainstream academic commentary on Indigenous cultures. It means being specific about which nations and cultures you are drawing from: “Indigenous” covers hundreds of distinct nations with different languages, cosmologies, and political histories. It means crediting Indigenous intellectual and cultural sources explicitly. And it means accepting that some knowledge systems are not yours to write about regardless of how thoroughly you have researched them. Community consultation, actually talking with and listening to members of the specific communities whose cultures you are engaging with, is not a nice-to-have; it is the minimum standard for responsible engagement.

Technology and Tradition: Refusing the False Binary

One of the persistent colonial tropes that Indigenous Futurism explicitly refuses is the idea that Indigenous peoples are defined by pre-technological tradition and that technology belongs to modernity, which belongs to Western culture. Indigenous communities have always been technologically innovative and continue to be: contemporary Indigenous scientists work in quantum physics, genomics, environmental engineering, and every other field. Indigenous Futurism imagines futures in which this innovation continues on Indigenous terms, integrated with traditional knowledge systems rather than replacing them. The Marrow Thieves imagines a dystopian future in which Indigenous peoples have survived a climate catastrophe that destroyed settler civilisation because their land-based knowledge systems were more resilient. That is the kind of speculative logic that refuses the technology-versus-tradition binary.

Narrative Structure: Non-Linear Time and Relational Storytelling

Indigenous narrative traditions often have structural assumptions that differ fundamentally from the Western three-act structure derived from Aristotle. Stories may be organised around seasonal cycles, genealogical relationships, geographical features, or ceremonial calendars rather than individual protagonist arcs. Character identity may be understood relationally, defined by kinship and community obligations, rather than as individual interiority. These structural differences are not deficiencies relative to Western narrative form; they are different solutions to the question of how to organise meaningful story. Indigenous Futurism at its most formally adventurous uses these alternative structures as the basis for its narrative form, producing fiction that reads differently from mainstream SF not just in content but in shape. Study Indigenous oral narrative traditions as seriously as you study Western story structure.

The Genre's Political Stakes: Land, Sovereignty, and Climate

Indigenous Futurism exists in a specific political context: Indigenous land sovereignty remains an unresolved political question in nearly every settler-colonial state, and climate change disproportionately threatens Indigenous communities while those communities often possess the land-based knowledge most relevant to ecological survival. These political stakes are not background to Indigenous Futurism; they are its most urgent subject matter. The speculative question is not merely “what if Indigenous people exist in the future” but “what political structures, what land relationships, what forms of sovereignty make Indigenous futures possible?” The best Indigenous Futurism takes those questions seriously and imagines answers that are neither utopian fantasies nor dystopian inevitabilities but genuine speculative explorations of what a world built on different foundations could look like.

Write futures that belong to everyone

iWrity helps speculative fiction writers develop complex world-building frameworks rooted in diverse knowledge systems and community accountability.

Try iWrity Free

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Indigenous Futurism and how does it differ from mainstream SF?

Indigenous Futurism centres Indigenous peoples' visions of their own futures rather than futures imagined by colonial cultures. Where mainstream SF has often erased Indigenous peoples from future timelines, Indigenous Futurism insists on survivance: the active presence and continuity of Indigenous cultures, not their disappearance.

Who are the leading writers in Indigenous Futurism?

Grace Dillon (Anishinaabe) framed the genre academically and edited the foundational anthology Walking the Clouds. Key fiction writers include Cherie Dimaline (Métis), Stephen Graham Jones (Blackfeet), and Darcie Little Badger (Lipan Apache). The anthology Love after the End, edited by Joshua Whitehead, collects queer Indigenous SF specifically.

Can non-Indigenous writers write Indigenous Futurism?

Non-Indigenous writers should not write Indigenous protagonists claiming to represent specific cultural knowledge from the inside. What they can do: write supporting Indigenous characters as full human beings without cultural tourism, support Indigenous writers' work, and engage deeply with Indigenous-authored criticism and fiction before writing anything. Community consultation with specific nations is the minimum standard for responsible engagement.

How do Indigenous cosmologies inform futurist world-building?

Many Indigenous traditions understand time cyclically, land relationally, and community obligations reciprocally. These are different ontological frameworks, not primitive versions of Western concepts. A speculative world built on reciprocal land relationships produces fundamentally different political structures and technologies from one built on extraction. Using Indigenous cosmologies as world-building foundations changes the world's logic, not just its flavour.

What is the relationship between Indigenous Futurism and Afrofuturism?

Both movements use speculative fiction to imagine futures for peoples whose humanity has been systematically denied by colonial and racist ideologies. They share the project of centring non-Western knowledge systems and refusing to treat Western capitalist modernity as the default future. Grace Dillon explicitly situates Indigenous Futurism in dialogue with the Afrofuturist tradition.

Imagine Futures That Belong to Everyone

iWrity helps speculative fiction writers build worlds grounded in diverse knowledge systems, reciprocal relationships, and futures that centre every community.

Get Started Free